Maybe Claire McCaskill Belongs to the Wrong Party
Seeking high-dollar campaign donations must mean McCaskill is going after Republicans.
U.S. Senator from Missouri Claire McCaskill, a Democrat, sent me an invitation to a late lunch of snacks at a downtown hotel. To attend I could pay anywhere from $500 to $2,500. It was too pricey for my tastes, and I wrote about it here.
But I have always liked Claire. She was a young girl in Houston, Missouri and then in Lebanon, Missouri. She finished high school in Columbia, Missouri, where her mother was on the city council and her father served in Governor Hearnes’ administration.
What I liked best about Claire is that she worked her way through college and law school. One of the summer jobs she had was as a waitress at Lake of the Ozarks.
And McCaskill never used her law degree to make a lot of money. She always worked in government. She got rich the old fashion way—she married it.
Now in my March 19 column, I mentioned how as an elected official, I wrote to McCaskill about an issue impacting constituents. A neighbor of mine, who is an appointed Federal official, also wrote McCaskill about an important matter affecting Missourians. Neither of us ever heard back from McCaskill—or her people.
But then when I finally do hear from McCaskill, it's the letter in March for the $500-to-$2,500 “late lunch snack” with her.
Back in 1989, when McCaskill was a state representative from Kansas City, she helped me on an article I was writing for a national magazine on DWI reform. I remembered that in 2006 when I moved back to Missouri and maybe I sent her a $25 campaign contribution, and that's why I’m now on her mailing list.
Then later, I got an invitation from McCaskill to attend a Saturday brunch at what is called “Claire’s Home Kirkwood, Missouri” but is actually her compound, if you have ever seen the place.
To attend this “brunch” the invitation asks for a contribution of between $500 and $10,000. Maybe for $500 you get scrambled eggs and hash browns, but for $10,000 you also get the fresh squeezed orange juice, carved roast beef and desert included?
The invitation says once you send in the money, McCaskill’s address will be given to you.
Well I don’t need Claire’s address! When we have out-of-town guests, I always drive them by a house on Twin Springs in Ladue, and then Claire’s Kirkwood house, to show them two of the largest houses in St. Louis County.
Here is what I don’t understand. Sen. McCaskill is a Democrat. She represents the people, and is the candidate who gets the union vote.
But she is having “late afternoon snacks” for $500-$2,500 and brunches for $500-$10,000. Isn’t that Republican campaign pricing?
If I had $500 laying around, I would probably give it to the Salvation Army before a political candidate, but I would be curious to see the spread for a $500-$10,000 brunch.
It seems to me that a good Democratic would be inviting people to a cookout.
McCaskill could have a hot dog-and-soft drink (or beer) lunch at her house for $25. She could buy the stuff at Sam’s Club or Costco or have someone else buy it since those places have non-union staff.
A can of Coke is about 37 cents. A can of beer at Costco would be maybe 65 cents. The hot dog, bun, relish and paper plate would run you maybe $1.40.
That is a 1700 percent profit against a $25 contribution. You could run 50 people through every hour between 12 noon and 5pm.
If you think back to old school Democrats like Richard Daley in Chicago, or Frank Skeffington in the novel and movie The Last Hurrah, the Democratic politicians weren’t asking $2,500 for a lunch snack or $10,000 for brunch.
Instead, they were buying the voters beers and shots at local bars.
Teri
8:47 am on Monday, June 4, 2012
Maybe Claire McCaskill belongs to the wrong party? Maybe Mr. John Hoffman needs to spend more time educating himself re: 'the other party'. Dear Mr. Hoffman, if I didn't know any better I would think you are STEREOTYPING?!?! I have attended 'the other party's' and at times, have paid next to nothing and guess what 'the other party' has cookouts at times.....hmmm!!!! Also, Mr. Hoffman so, you are saying that if you happen to be in that 'other party' they have a house as big as the one Claire McCaskill has............hmmmm, NOT true, either. Also, Mr. Hoffman, you say you never heard back from C. Mccaskill etc. You are not implying that if you contact 'the other party' one would also not hear back, as you say? Right? Mr. Hoffman, here is what I don't understand, last time I looked..........'the other party' also represents the people. Mr. Hoffman, please correct me here if I'm wrong.
Bill McKenzie
9:47 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012
Yes, it seems counter-intuitive that for the last few decades the wealthiest people in Congress have been Democrats. That must be where the money is.
I went to a Republican township meeting in Maplewood a few years ago. I expected to be surrounded by spoiled rich people like...well like Mitt Romney. I was shocked to find myself surrounded by what I can only describe as patriots. They were some of the finest people I have ever met.
This gets curioser and curioser. Who are these people who get into power? Why do the people at the top almost always seem corrupt?
Most of us have heard Lord Acton's maxim about power corrupting and absolute power corrupting absolutely. Most of us forget that he then said that most great men are bad men.
Unfortunately most of the people at the top have sold their souls for money. They have tremendous opportunity for graft.
I agree with William F. Buckley that I would rather be governed by the first fifty people in the phone book than by our current governing class.
Even in a system like ours the scum rises to the top.
The Tea Party is the most encouraging movement in contemporary politics. Simple patriots.
Jean Whitney
2:48 am on Thursday, June 14, 2012
I had never heard that Wm.F. Buckley quote! Awfully funny with a grain of truth! I just learned that he was CIA. Did you know that Bill?